~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"TIPS
and TOPICS" from David Mee-Lee, M.D.
Vol 1, No.6
October
2003
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In this issue
-- SAVVY........
-- SKILLS........
-- SOUL.........
-- SHAMELESS SELLING.....
-- STUMP the SHRINK...
-- Until next time......
WELCOME!
A
TIPS & TOPICS reader recently asked about
information on adolescent treatment. I realized
that many of you are working with youth and
adolescents, and we have not addressed your
needs specifically thus far. So for everyone
who works with adolescents, or has ever been
an adolescent, this edition is for you.
SAVVY........
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The
reader wrote:
"It is difficult to sort out addiction from
abuse with adolescents. My sense is we have
more addicts than in previous years".
These
two sentences echo what many in the behavioral
health field experience. They raise a variety
of assessment and treatment issues. I suspect
the reader was not asking about the fine points
of distinction between the diagnostic criteria
of Substance Abuse versus Substance Dependence
(See the Substance Use Disorders section of
the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
-DSM-IV.)
Rather,
I took the comment to raise this question:
when is an adolescent just being an adolescent
and experimenting with alcohol and other drugs?
How do you tell if s/he is now addicted, needing
definitive addiction treatment versus education
and risk counseling?
Tips:
-
In assessing adolescents, developmental
issues are paramount. But over- emphasizing
developmental issues can hold the danger
of minimizing a young person's alcohol or
other drug use, and dismissing problems
as youthful indiscretion and experimentation.
Conversely, forgetting developmental issues
can hold a danger of seeing adolescent addiction
everywhere - every time we hear of an Ecstasy
death at a rave party, or read about five
drunk teens in a car wreck.
-
Because children and adolescents are not
independent and rely heavily on adult support,
they often have food, clothing, shelter
and money in their pocket regardless of
what their drinking or drugging may be doing
to their educational, legal and social life.
In other words, when an adolescent says:
"I don't see what the problem is"; or "You're
making a big deal about nothing", their
statements may be quite genuine. They may
not be experiencing any tangible difficulties
their using causes. In contrast, an adult
whose marriage, job, finances and mortgage
are on the line because of their drinking
and drugging can not so easily ignore the
consequences of their use.
One obvious clinical implication is this:
it is critical to involve the family
and significant others in both assessment
and treatment. Parental attitudes and
behavior about substance use; limit setting
and disciplinary style; and the family history
of addiction all influence the diagnostic
and treatment process. For example, a parent
whose father was alcohol-dependent and physically
abusive may have determined to be a teetotaler.
He may overreact to his son's experimentation
with alcohol and see addiction where it
does not exist. Or parents who repeatedly
threaten consequences but do not set consistent,
predictable limits, may prolong recognition
of their teenager's out-of- control substance
dependence.
-
Two free resources available from the National
Clearinghouse for Alcohol/Drug Information,
Rockville, MD: (800) 729-6686) are:
>> "Screening and Assessing Adolescents
for Substance Use Disorders" Treatment Improvement
Protocol (TIP) Series No. 31. Revision Consensus
Panel Chair Ken C. Winters, Ph.D. Center
for Substance Abuse Treatment DHHS Publication
No. (SMA) 99-3344, 1999.
>> "Treatment of Adolescents With
Substance Use Disorders" Treatment Improvement
Protocol (TIP) Series No. 32. Revision Consensus
Panel Chair Ken C. Winters, Ph.D. Center
for Substance Abuse Treatment DHHS Publication
No. (SMA) 99-3345, 1999.
SKILLS........
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So
how do you decide if the adolescent substance
use is just "normal" developmental experimentation,
or problem use? Is the speeding or drinking-driving
violation simple youthful omnipotent risk-taking,
or substance- dependent dangerous behavior?
Besides the help you can get from active involvement
of parents and significant others, here are
a few other tips.
Tips:
-
A biopsychosocial perspective can help.
If several areas of the adolescent's functioning
are being affected, it may be addiction.
> Bio: Is the adolescent's substance
use beginning to affect his or her physical
health like oversleeping; increased or
decreased appetite and weight; poor personal
hygiene and self-care?
> Psych: Are their frequent
emotional outbursts and mood changes of
a different quality from the teen's usual
temperament and emotional style? Are there
frequent displays of hostile, defensive
arguments; or the reverse - isolated,
withdrawn depression or irritability?
> Social: Has there been a persistent
attachment ,or clear change in friends,
to the 'drug crowd?' Are school grades
persistently deteriorating? Are there
ongoing incidents of appearing drunk or
high at school? Missing money at home?
- One
or two of these signs may well just be a
developmental issue.
For example, a teen may not bathe or eat
well to distinguish himself from the good
little boy who always washed behind his
ears or ate his vegetables. Or rather than
mature reflection, she may express frustration
or self-doubt in emotional outbursts or
irritability. Grades may be poor because
the peer group is not invested in studying.
The teen's priority of socializing now is
much more interesting than delayed gratification.
The long-term view (of how the poor grades
will affect college choices in two years'
time) melts at tonight's party.
But if there is a "pattern of biopsychosocial"
warning signs that cut across all life areas
plus a steady deterioration of function,
then the red flags are up for DSM Substance
Abuse or Substance Dependence.
- Advocate
for a period of abstinence or cutting back
on use of substances if the your family
work and history assessment still leaves
you unclear about the "normal development
or addiction problem" diagnostic challenge.
If your client has trouble cutting back
or stopping, this signals a high likelihood
of a substance use disorder.
Firstly of course, you will need to engage
the adolescent in a discussion of such an
abstinence or reduced-use trial. It is unlikely
to reveal much helpful data if the teen
agrees under the duress of court or jail,
but has no intention of being honest about
the diagnostic trial. One strategy that
can work if done sincerely is this: join
with the adolescent in a formal treatment
contract that you will help him get people
off his back. As part of the plan to prove
to them (the court or parents) that he has
no substance use problem (which is what
he declares) the teen agrees to a period
of abstinence or measurable reduction of
use.
SOUL.........
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Many
of you who were once adolescents will remember
what it was like to not know what you
want in life. And it wasn't just about the
big things- what kind of career to pursue,
what you wanted in choosing a girlfriend,
boyfriend or life partner. It was even about
such life and death issues of what
to wear at the prom, whether to play volleyball
or soccer or both? Not knowing what you want
is not an affliction of adolescence alone.
It rears its ugly head at all of life's developmental
milestones and "passages".
Do
I want a fulltime job right now - to get on
the career treadmill having just graduated
from college? Or do I want to travel the world
before I settle down? Where would I want to
live and settle down anyway? Should I marry
first or concentrate on my career? What about
having kids? Should I change careers to get
satisfaction more than the financial security
that has kept me in this job way longer than
my heart wanted? Should I retire? Move to
somewhere warm? Would I want to be a "vegetable"
on a respirator, or would I want my family
to pull the plug? And the questions go on!
I
just received a shipment of books brand new
and hot off the presses. It's called "Maintain
Balance in an Unsteady World" with a variety
of chapters written by speakers of the National
Speakers Association. I enjoy writing these
monthly TIPS & TOPICS and it is personally
gratifying, especially when I hear how it
has positively impacted many readers. And
I also enjoyed writing one of the chapters
in this newly released book. My chapter is
called: "What Do You Want? - The Not-so-Simple
Question".
Knowing what you want can go a long way towards
decreased stress, worry, and diversionary
waste of time, energy and resources. Asking
and answering "What Do You Want?" is good
for treatment contracting with clients and
patients; but is also good for clarifying
goals at every stage of life. It promotes
conscious, mindful, living at choice rather
than reactive, defensive victim- thinking.
Now,
let me add another "S" just to this month's
TIPS & TOPICS list of S's. The new "S" is:
Shameless Selling.
SHAMELESS
SELLING.....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I
want my Tips & Topics readers to be among
the first to hear about and have the book
with my chapter in it. I'm excited that the
book is out. I hope you find the chapter useful.
I want you to buy it - and maybe even read
my chapter! In the good tradition of the TV
infomercials, here is the deal (no Ginzu kitchen
knives I'm afraid!).
At
my website, click on the "New" announcement
link on the bottom of the homepage. You will
be taken to more information on a special
introductory offer for "Maintain Balance in
an Unsteady World" with my chapter "What Do
You Want?"
But
this offer expires on October 31. So take a
look soon. That's the end of my Shameless Selling
segment.
Click
here to read about "What Do You Want? The
Not-So-Simple Question"
STUMP
the SHRINK...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here's
a recent question where I got stumped!
Question-
Issue
"In
Dimension 4-Level I a client has to agree
to services but be ambivalent about recovery
, resistant to acknowledging problem areas
or be more interested in avoiding negative
consequences than in recovery efforts. We
happen to have many adolescents who agree
to treatment and want to be clean for internal
reasons without being ambivalent or resistant.
Currently there is no official place for them
in the criteria. This is a problem! The old
ASAM Level I was more inclusive - with or
without admission of a problem, monitoring
and motivating strategies are needed to identify
treatment issues.
Also,
our program manager would like to know if
there is an ASAM requirement of treatment
reviews (every two or three months, for example)
when no change in level is indicated. Currently,
we are required by OHP, etc. for their recipients.
What about self-pay clients?
Thank
you very much and thank you also for your
illuminating newsletter."
Sally
Louise Smith L.C.S.W.
Linn County Alcohol and Drug
Response
Hi Sally Louise:
On Dimension 4-Level I:
I am on the road and don't have my ASAM PPC-2R
with me, so can't quote chapter and verse.
But are you reading all the Dimension 4, Level
I criteria? The criteria about ambivalence
etc. were additions to what was already there
in Level I to allow OP to be used to do motivational
enhancement work. But the old criteria were
not removed, so the person who is indeed ready
to change for internal reasons is still covered
by the Dimension 4 criteria in Level I.
Check
again and if you can't see those "healthier"
type criteria, let me know. Or if they are
worded unclearly, let me know page and number
and I will check them when I get home. Be
sure you are reading the actual Dimension
4 criteria in the ASAM PPC-2R book, not the
much-abbreviated summary crosswalk, which
is not the whole detail on the criteria, though
in general it gives a bird's eye view of the
criteria.
On treatment reviews:
The ASAM PPC does not prescribe any set time
periods for treatment reviews. That is up
to the type of program, level of care, local
standards etc. In general, I recommend that
a rule of thumb (not official ASAM PPC policy)
is every six sessions. So if it were Level
II.5, then that would be a treatment plan
review every week. If Level II.1, it would
be about every two weeks. If in Level I, it
would be every six weeks, if the person were
coming once a week; or every three weeks if
they were coming twice a week.
If
they were stable and being seen once a month,
then it would be every six months in Level
I, as not much would change much at that low
level of monitoring. When it comes to residential
and intensive IP, the frequency depends on
the severity. In level IV, where someone is
quite unstable, the progress is usually reviewed
every 8 hour shift. In residential levels,
if someone were unstable, but not acute care,
it might be every day until more stable, but
I would think not less frequently than once
a week.
If
residential is being used as a long-term supportive
living environment as in Level III.1, then
treatment plan review might be perhaps once
a month. The principle is to review the treatment
plan at an interval that is relevant to how
unstable a person is and the rate of their
progress and change with the strategies being
used in the treatment plan. If there is a
lot of instability and more rapid change e.g.,
in acute withdrawal, or suicidal behavior,
them more frequent review is needed. If stable
and and not much intensity of service is required,
then the interval of time is longer as the
client's severity and level of function is
not fluctuating as much and therefore does
not need to be reviewed as often.
Second
Reponse from Sally
"David,
Thanks so much for getting back to us. The
long form of the criteria does not offer any
real difference than the short one for Dimension
4 Level I. We did not know the old criteria
were not removed. Thank you, too, for the
treatment review response.
Sally"
Further
response from DML
Sally:
I checked again ASAM PPC-2 and ASAM PPC-2R
when I returned home and I see the problem
you raised. You wrote: "We happen to have
many adolescents who agree to treatment and
want to be clean for internal reasons without
being ambivalent or resistant. Currently there
is no official place for them in the criteria.
This is a problem!"
I
was not as directly involved in the Adolescent
Workgroup. In the Adult Criteria we added
to the "healthier" criteria, but did not change
the situation of the person who was wanting
to change etc. So there isn't the same issue
in the Adult Criteria.
But
as I re-read the Adolescent Criteria, I agree
that the fully internally-motivated, ready-to-change
adolescent is not covered in Dimension 4 now
as in ASAM PPC-2. I think I know why the Adolescent
Workgroup modified Dimension 4, in Level I.
I believe the thinking might have been that
adolescents are so often brought into treatment,
that ambivalence is a very common presentation.
If there was no ambivalence, then the adolescent
would not need any motivational enhancement
or monitoring services and could go to self/help
mutual help services themselves without the
need for professional treatment.
But
you are right, the adolescent who from day
1 or outpatient visit #1 is fully resolved
that s/he has an addiction and/or mental health
problem and is ready to do whatever it takes
for recovery is not covered by Dimension 4,
Level I adolescent criteria. These are admission
criteria, and I think the workgroup felt that
all adolescents enter with some readiness
to change issues. It could be that in the
course of treatment, the adolescent is fully
ready on Dimension 4, but not able to cope
with cravings or peer refusal skills on Dimension
5 which then warrants Level I or more intense
treatment. That situation is covered in the
Continuing Service Criteria.
Anyway,
there is a problem as written, as you correctly
point out. But it is a problem only if you
have adolescents who, at admission into treatment
right from the beginning, have no ambivalence
about having a problem; and are indeed ready
to change and do whatever it takes for recovery.
These patients would not be covered by Dimension
4, Level I and I will put that on the list
of concerns from the field.
Thanks
for your feedback and correction.
David
Until next time......
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That's
it for this month. I would love to hear any
Success Stories on implementing any of the
TIPS and TOPICS. Send an e-mail and tell us
how much identifying data you are comfortable
sharing here. Talk to you next month.
David.
Contact Information
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
email: info@dmlmd.com
voice: 530-753-4300
web: http://www.dmlmd.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|